Theory Examination (Semester-II) 2015-16 PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

This is a 3-hour Theory Examination for Communication Skills / Applied English (NAS-204 / EAS-204 / NAS-104) with a total of 100 marks. The question paper is divided into three sections, and students must attempt questions as per the instructions. The paper tests English grammar, vocabulary, sentence correction, homophones, communication theory, negotiation skills, listening comprehension, and understanding of essays prescribed in the syllabus.

Section – A (20 Marks)

Section A requires students to attempt any four out of several short-answer parts.
Each question carries 5 marks, designed to test basic English usage and grammar.
Topics include:

requirements of good writing

methods to introduce variety in sentence construction

meaning and usage of selected vocabulary words

difference between commonly confused homophones (Gate–Gait, Birth–Berth, Stationary–Stationery, etc.)

flow of communication in an organization

role of upward communication in promoting democracy within an organization

This section checks basic grammar, vocabulary, sentence formation skills, and communication concepts.

Section – B (20 Marks)

Section B requires students to attempt any two questions, each worth 10 marks.
This section tests the student’s ability to understand professional communication and includes:

types of negotiation and qualities of a good negotiator

methods to improve comprehension and listening skills

importance of listening in effective speaking

correcting grammatically incorrect sentences

meaning and usage of homophones (Coarse–Course, Deceased–Diseased, etc.)

This section focuses on practical English usage, workplace communication, and grammar correction.

Section – C (20 Marks)

Section C requires students to attempt any two long-answer questions, each carrying 10 marks.
These questions are based on essays or reading material prescribed in the course. Topics include:

scientific approach in human activity as explained by M. E. Prior

functions of philosophy in criticizing and synthesizing scientific findings, as described by A. J. Bahm

explanation of key ideas, arguments, and conclusions from the essays

This section tests the student’s analytical ability, interpretation of essays, and understanding of philosophical and scientific viewpoints.

Overall Summary

This question paper evaluates a student’s ability in:

English grammar and usage

vocabulary building

sentence correction

communication theory

listening and negotiation skills

understanding of essays and concepts related to science and philosophy

Section A checks short conceptual understanding,
Section B checks applied grammar and communication,
and Section C checks deep comprehension and essay-based answers.